You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

It is not a pretend job. She is complicit. And even if it was, which is not, she has been side by side Biden supporting him as he carries out his genocide. Moreover, she is deep in AIPAC’s pocket. The fact that you believe there is any innocent Democrat in power is concerning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Dude, she’s as complicit as you- (i am assuming) a US Citizen are…moreover if you pay taxes and vote… shame on yoy baby killer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Okay all true, but the VP is still a pretend job. Maybe not as much as it was before but the VP doesn’t actually have very much power. Unless the president is article 12’d amendment 25’d.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Did you mean the 25th amendment? Article 12 just describes the process for electing the president and VP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Yes, if she was actually innocent she would have been pushing to have Biden removed from office via the 25th Amendment so that she could take over his job and end the genocide as soon as possible. She’s a careerist and would never dare risk her own political career for something like that, so instead she’s meekly following along and making small gestures without committing.

But, even a careerist could see the benefits of being the US president that ended support for apartheid and genocide.

Don’t get me wrong, my expectations for US politicians are really low. It’s not like I’m donating money to her or anything, I’m just going to take a little bit of time to mail in a ballot because she might be less genocidal than Biden or Trump.

She’s not standing up against the genocide as Vice, but she literally hasn’t actually done anything to advance it either.

And that’s my red line - no doing genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply

She will do more marginally reasonable rhetoric about Palestinian suffering while the material policy of 100% support for Israel will not be changed in the slightest. She wouldn’t have been the pick otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s a limit to how much she can push rhetoric before it causes a fundamental break within US society. Already we’re seeing unprecedented criticism of Israel and support for Palestinian resistance among USians, and the more she pays lip service to voters on this issue the starker the contradictions become between her words and her actions.

That’s not a bad result at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

She was the first one to call for a ceasefire and asking Israel to give aid to Gazans. She may be complicit but to say that she’s done nothing seems inaccurate.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 32K

    Comments