There are too many of these people on lemmy(lemmy.world)

Invading another country preventively in the wake of WW2 and the threat of Nazism =/= imperialism, I’m sorry buddy. Not defending the invasion of Estonia, but categorising it as imperialism is dumb and ahistorical.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Flying Squid@lemmy.world

6 points

4 months ago

Invading another country preventively

That’s quite the excuse. Seems to me Putin is using the same one about Ukraine right now…

Also, what did annexing Armenia prevent? How about annexing Uzbekistan?

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

volodya_ilich@lemm.ee

0 points

4 months ago

That’s quite the excuse. Seems to me Putin is using the same one about Ukraine right now.…

Again, I’m not defending the invasion of Estonia, and obviously not that of Ukraine, the context of WW2 was clear, and the fact that the USSR didn’t invade and annex any country after WW2 kinda tells you all you need to know about the actual reasons of the expansion during WW2.

Also, what did annexing Armenia prevent?

Most likely the defeat of Armenia against Turkey in an incumbent war, and the furthering of the Armenian genocide.

How about annexing Uzbekistan?

Women in Uzbekistan before the USSR were 99%+ illiterate and were basically slaves to their husbands, and the whole country was a poor, agrarian, backwards regime. The USSR brought equality and development, healthcare, education, pensions, industrialization, and an overwhelming betterment of the living conditions of Uzbeki people by basically all accounts. Maybe that’s part of the reason why in the 1991 referendum to preserve the USSR, 95% of Uzbeki voted “yes”.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Flying Squid@lemmy.world

6 points

4 months ago

Are you actually claiming that the Soviets invaded and annexed Armenia to prevent an Armenian genocide and that the Uzbeks were so stupid that they deserved to be invaded and annexed? Because the first is ludicrous and the latter is just racist.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

volodya_ilich@lemm.ee

-1 points

4 months ago

Social development and class struggle aren’t matters of stupidity or superior races, but of material and historical conditions. Uzbekistan didn’t have the material and historical conditions up to 1917 that allowed for the emancipation of women. Hell, 90% of Tsarist Russia were serfs bound legally to the lands they worked, how progressive can we imagine these people were? It was only through socialism that women were able to considerably (though not completely) liberate themselves, thanks to the work of intellectual feminists like Kollontai and to the social progress achieved in the 20s in the RSFSR and posterior Soviet Union. The Bolsheviks liberated Uzbekistan from their feudal system and their most oppressive customs, while maintaining the language and culture in the region, which again explains why 95% of people in Uzbekistan voted to stay in a socialist USSR.

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

13K
Monthly active users
3.1K
Posts
134K
Comments

Community stats

Community moderators