You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

We should probably start with reducing the rate of increase first. Then talk about reducing emissions per year. As for zero emissions, I fail to see how we have a civilization of any sort without some emissions. Maybe that’s the point. Was “Net Zero” a hidden word for collapse all along?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Emissions have been falling in the US and EU since ~2005 or so, and look to be about to start falling in China, which means that they’ll be falling worldwide after this year.

But…they’ll likely be falling slowly, rather than rapidly, which is a problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a really hopeful reading of that chart. What I see in that chart is that even a year or two of falling emissions could quickly be wiped away. Just look at 2022.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s a bit more than that; there are policies in place which make Chinese emissions likely to slowly drop from here on out

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments

Community moderators