To clarify, the pictured poster Caroline Kwan is an ally, not a TERF. The TERFs referred to in the title are the ones ‘protecting a very specific idea of what a woman is’

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
34 points

No matter what arbitrary divisions are in place, be that gender or weight or race or whatever, there will always be people who dominate the field. That doesn’t destroy the Olympics as a sport competition, that is the Olympics as a sport competition. Competing in order to find the best of the best, the “freaks of nature” who manage to far surpass the average person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Competition is core to human nature, but so is fairness. Which is why men and women compete in different categories. If you want to discourage women athletes to compete it would seem somewhat unfair to me, but really I only care enough to correct technical points in a discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I don’t know your political leanings, but this is consistent with the same people who are anti-DEI and anti-anything else that forces equality.

So what’s so wrong about forcing equality literally anywhere else? Or, why is it necessary only in women’s sports?

Then, going back to the original post, why is Michael Phelps lauded despite having clear genetic advantages?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or, why is it necessary only in women’s sports?

As a general rule in sports, men participate in essentially “open” leagues, while women’s leagues exist to protect women from having to compete against everyone else to promote women taking part. In other words, women’s leagues are already a form of protectionism to encourage participation because people care about women having a “fair” environment to participate in in a way they do not for men.

This idea that sports leagues for women/girls are a form of protectionism even extends down to school sports and Title IX, which is why under current Title IX policy girls must be allowed to try out for boys teams but not the reverse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

But where are you basing your definition of “fairness”? If you exclude people with a biological advantage, since that would be unfair, then literally all current athletes would be excluded, since by qualifying for the Olympics they have proven that they have a strong biological advantage over the average person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The only solution is to Harrison Bergeron everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 681

    Monthly active users

  • 341

    Posts

  • 2.7K

    Comments

Community moderators