You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

So what evidence convinced you that was the case?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Aside from the multiple news sources reporting that he was hit by glass fragments from the teleprompter, the wound is pretty obviously not from a bullet. An intact bullet would have caused much more damage, which would have taken much longer to heal.

Edit: I’m not linking to any articles because I have no idea what news sources you’re going to claim are “fake news”. The information is out there if you want to find it, and plenty of information claiming “he took a bullet for his country” if you don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

lol I wasn’t planning on calling anything fake news. I was just curious if there was more to it than the teleprompter fragment bit, which I don’t believe. But it has always been perplexing to me that the wound was so “minimal” and how quickly it seemed to just be gone. Like look at the interview from the Black Journalists convention. It looks fuckin’ fine lmao

By the way, I don’t believe the teleprompter bit simply because it doesn’t seem physically possible. Maybe I’m wrong. 🤷🏼‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah okay. My bad for misjudging you. But yeah, how quickly it healed is evidence enough. My ear piercings took longer to heal than his “gunshot wound”. LOL

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Weirdos

!political_weirdos@lemmy.world

Create post

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

  • Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
  • Follow Iemmy.world TOS
  • Don’t be a jerk

Community stats

  • 3.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 204

    Posts

  • 6.9K

    Comments

Community moderators