You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

I agree that we need regulation. But I think you also discount the effects of individual consumption.

In the long-ish term, the animal farming indistry has to go. It cannot be made sustainable, no matter how you regulate industry. It’s just a waste of resources. So at some point you as an individual have to adapt to a vegan diet, either by choice or because there is no alternative. What will it be? Do you want to stop eating meat the moment it is outlawed?

People who cling to eating meat nowadays actively oppose regulation. Otherwise they couln’t eat meat. There is still a demand. We need both regulation to end animal farming and convince individual consumers, that they have to become vegans. It’s the masses who have the most power. If veganism came from the majority population, it would be far easier to regulate industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Would you support enforced veganism, and jailing anybody who eats or prepares meat?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why does everything have to go to the extreme end of straight to jail?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The post to which I replied said:

So at some point you as an individual have to adapt to a vegan diet, either by choice or because there is no alternative.

Do you want to stop eating meat the moment it is outlawed?

We need both regulation to end animal farming and convince individual consumers, that they have to become vegans

If they want “regulations” to “end” animal farming then I just want to be clear that they support imprisoning people who prepare or eat meat. They went to the extreme of jail without mentioning the word jail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Would you destroy the world for taste? I don’t get where your question is coming from

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I just want to be clear what your position is. You’re not just encouraging veganism, you’re calling on the violence of the police to beat and imprison people who eat meat.

I’m not necessarily arguing against it, I just want the clarity that you finally provided.

It’s easy to suggest outlawing stuff without considering the violence necessary for outlawing things. You have clearly considered (and enthusiastically endorse) that violence.

Of course if you imprison all meat eaters but still use oil to harvest, process, and distribute all the plant based foods then the world will still burn, but that’s beyond the scope of this particular issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

No, I don’t support jail for anyone, because it’s a bad way to solve crime. I think anyone who eats meat should be sentenced to something productive like community service, or therapy to get to the bottom of why they think they have the right to kill others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I would refuse that community service and therapy. What would happen then?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators