The emissions from the EV are largely because we’ve not yet gotten fossil fuels out of electric generation.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

Even better of course. Not that there are many on the market in the US; automakers are increasing the size of every model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Doubtful. Smaller cars are more aerodynamic and much higher fuel economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

The same drop in energy needs applies to the EV too, along with sharply reduced emissions associated with manufacturing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nope, that’s not how physics works. SUVs are insanely inefficient. A box on wheels. 11MPG vs 50. Likewise, all electric vehicles have more mass than their engine equivalents. And that mass is constant. Aerodynamic shit cars are simple piles of metal that ingest a chemical and produce range. Not even getting into the human and environmental cost of battery production.

Gas propulsion cars need to die, no question. Only because their fuel is finite and there are much better options now. However, there is no easy Apple keynote solution. It is complex and sometimes doesn’t make sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators