You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-37 points

I know what they really mean!”

Perfect example of what I’m talking about, lol. Lazy ideologue tactics 101.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

If you don’t realise how supporting a politician who defunds school lunches is an active statement that childen shouldn’t be fed, then your cause-and-effect detector is broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

I’m not falling for that, I know the games legislators play with bundling shit into a bill so that anyone who votes for/against it based on one part is now declared as being firmly for/against everything in it, because ‘they voted for/against it’.

And what you’re saying here takes it a step further than that, by taking it beyond a bill to “supporting a politician”. So let’s say a politician makes it so that hospitals have to be more transparent about itemizing things on their bills. Okay, I support that, and say so. But now people like you come along and say that I’m “supporting a politician who” and then name all sorts of shit I said nothing about supporting.

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
  • Vote for a politician who defunds school lunch programmes
  • Children go hungry
  • ???
  • I did not vote for children to go hungry, Bill Riders said I’m not responsible

Yeah, if a bill has unacceptable riders, then anyone with a conscience will vote against it and say clearly why. “Oooh I wanted the bill but not that one part of it” isn’t an excuse to vote for starving children or kicking puppies or any other unconscionable thing.

Anyway your cause-and-effect detector is busted as fuck. Sorry little buddy, good luck fixing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’m not falling for that

Of course not, you’ve already fallen for something much worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I like your take, and your nuanced approach. People seem to be under the impression that their rage matters more than actually thinking about what caused it, and how best to address that.

If I were Republican, or voted Republican, and this shit happened, I’d be pissed. But more to the point, I’d find ways of fighting it, to whatever degree I can.

It is simply an unfortunate artifact of our system (of many systems) that there’s a lot of potential to lie. Changes in our system that mitigate that, and that fundamentally allow for more parties to participate in the process, are where we really need to head, long-term.

And in the short term, fuck that policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*

You’re getting blasted in this thread, but I wanted to thank you for bringing some nuance to this ridiculously partisan and strawman-y conversation.

Edit: Lol and they banned them for it. Jesus Christ Lemmy, you’re supposed to be better than Reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

!aiop@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a page for anything that’s amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer’s right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or ‘bad karma’. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can’t get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 766

    Posts

  • 3K

    Comments

Community moderators