You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-37 points

“There are plenty of people saying this”

shows no one saying this, and does the exact kind of extrapolation and exaggeration I talked about

Thanks for making my point for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Your argument is basically “yes, everything they do is racist, but they didn’t publicly say the N-word, so they can’t be racist.”

If every action a politican takes makes it so kids can’t eat, they don’t want kids to eat.

Whether they say “I don’t want kids to eat” doesn’t matter at all. The fact that you have to hear the literal evil being spoken aloud to acknowledge it is “you” problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But, if the quote about CEP is correct, the Republicans aren’t against feeding children at all. They are against providing free meals for people who can afford meals, and still providing free meals for eligible (poor) kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Providing free meals to every child is drastically more cost efficient per meal than attaching means testing, accounting, tracking and enforcement. It also prevents ignorant, overwhelmed or stubborn parents from feeding kids that should qualify but whose parents won’t enroll them. That last number accounts for nearly 20% of eligible kids in Minnesota alone:

While nearly 275,000 kids get free or reduced-price meals in Minnesota schools, at least 18 percent of students in grades K through 12  who could qualify for those benefits aren’t getting them because their families haven’t submitted the necessary paperwork to make them eligible.

It also helps kids who may be able to afford a meal, but whose circumstances prevented them from getting a meal that day. It also helps the local economy.

The cost for that free school lunch program in Minnesota? Less than 1% of the states yearly school budget.

No, the primary issue the GOP has expressed about feeding children is that “its welfare” and "there is no one hungry in our state." That is the main, stated issue with feeding any kid, that people will appreciate the program and vote for more like it.

The states that declined to participate in the program cited reasons such as problems with aging state computer systems, philosophical opposition to welfare programs, and a belief that existing free meal programs are sufficient. All 13 are led by Republican governors

Its not fiscal responsibility, its vindictive, partisan attack on children because the thing that demonstrably helps them and society at large undermines their party platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Actions > words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

This here is why no one wants to be your friend.

permalink
report
parent
reply

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

!aiop@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a page for anything that’s amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer’s right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or ‘bad karma’. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can’t get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 766

    Posts

  • 3K

    Comments

Community moderators