You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

why was this downvoted?

Because instead of reading the article you made assumptions and are now asking other commenters to spoon feed you the information that is in the article.

If you’re actually interested then RTFA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

It is not indicated in the article who the people from the popularized thumbs up photo are in relation to the family complaining. The article indicates the family was unhappy their family’s gravesite was included in the photo. I was curious if those in the photo were intimidated or coerced into posing, or if ANOTHER family is discussing ANOTHER gravestone, which is what I asked for clarity on. Getting a one word “no” is not useful, so I followed up.

Edit also this is a discussion forum, and my comment could also indicate I didn’t understand something. It’s not unreasonable to ask people to clarify.

Your reply is toxic, and assumes the worst of others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The first paragraph:

A New York Times reporter joined CNN on Wednesday night to discuss her reporting on the family of a Green Beret buried in Arlington National Cemetery expressing concern that former President Donald Trump’s campaign filmed at his gravesite without permission and in an area where campaign photos are banned.

Strongly implies it’s not the family in the picture.

If we continue reading:

His family told the Times that Marckesano’s gravesite was caught in pictures with Trump.

While another family said they wanted Trump there, this family did not.

The Marckesano family was not contacted or asked for this, but his gravestone is now in that TikTok video from behind,” said Times reporter Maggie Haberman on CNN, noting the front of the gravestone with his name is in pictures posted online with Trump giving a thumbs-up.

Steven Cheung, a Trump campaign spokesman, told the Times in a statement that “the campaign will continue to respect the wishes of the Gold Star family members who invited President Trump.”

Haberman noted Gold Star families are not a “monolith” and have differing political opinions. The “broader issue” in this case is whether Trump violated federal law.

“So far the Trump campaign has yet to provide documentation of its claim that it was permitted to do this and that there was an agreement,” she said.

It’s all very clear from the article if you tried reading it in the first place before asking others to explain it to you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

As I said, I did read it. I’m not taking a test here, I’m not held to academic rigor. I didn’t get it. I wasn’t satisfied with the implied conclusion you mentioned. I asked. This is an appropriate place to ask, and no one is obligated to respond.

There is nothing in your quoted text that definitely clarifies the following question: " was the pictured family the family that did not want the gravesite pictured? If so, were they coerced into taking that photo?" If not then we can assume the gravesite of the family in question is in the background and my question would have also been solved.

You are displaying very negative behavior, you could just not be involved, but have chosen to do so.

Edit for clarity: none of your responses have clarified who the family in the popularized photo is, that’s all I cared about, to see if that family was forced into that photo, which would be terrible

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Removed, civility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

It isn’t in the words, it’s implied, so finding it would indeed be hard.

Edit Beyond that, it is apparently hard for this group to just say

"My read is that the family form the article isn’t the one in the picture. "

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments