You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
4 points
*

Lead dev of grapheneos is extremely toxic in communication. I don’t trust someone like that developing the software running on a phone.

EDIT: This comment seems to be particularly controversial, with many people praising GrapheneOS as a project, while ignoring the developers views and actions. Although my opinion of the main developer is negative, the project itself and its goals are great. To clear up some confusion, I want to add to my previous statement:

At first, this seems like the standard “separating art from the artist”, however, GrapheneOS is a ton of code, not just art. When it comes to other forms of art, like literature or paintings, an artist maliciously hiding their personal beliefs in their otherwise “unbiased” work might degrade the quality of the final result, but does not have much significant impact outside of that. When it comes to code, programs, OSes, this changes. The artist (programmer) changing their art (code) based on their personal beliefs is not just a degradation in quality, but a security risk for anyone running the code and trusting the developer. Having seen the way the GOS dev speaks about its community and even people in support of him (see Louis Rossman’s video), it becomes clear that the mentioned “risk” of malware is very much present. Like many others, I don’t have the time to verify the source code of an entire Android rom myself, which means I would have to trust the GOS dev to not insert anything malicious, after the statements he’s made. I’d have to trust him after he’s grouped a majority of his community into “people who are after him and are swatting him”. It’s a very real possibility that someone with beliefs like that would add malicious code to his project, and I’m personally not willing to run that risk.

Please note that I am not encouraging people to “go harass the dev”, that is an immoral action nobody should be doing. I am trying to inform people of the developers behavior online, past and current, so they can make a decision for themselves whether to run his software on their personal devices.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Honestly, a lot of lead devs in fantastic FOSS software have pretty limited patience. I’ve read plenty of that guy’s discourse, and while I think he could be more diplomatic, I don’t see any reason to suspect he’s doing anything malicious with the project.

I’m personally totally fine using GrapheneOS. If you aren’t, there are plenty of alternatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“Limited patience” is understandable, but the behavior of the GrapheneOS dev is completely different. I’ve personally interacted with them not too long ago, and nothing has changed since the public accusations from a year ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s fair. I personally don’t interact with him, nor do I plan to (why would I?), so it really doesn’t bother me. As long as the other devs can manage dealing with him and the quality of the code stays high, I’m happy. If the other devs leave the project, I’ll look for forks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

He isn’t on the project since last year. androguru Edit: Sorry, meant “he isn’t the project lead since last year”. He is still part of the GitHub team and actively developing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
22 points

You can still be part of a project without being lead, to be part of the “we.” Did he contribute and/or is he part of GrapheneOS, yes? So he’s part of the “we.”

Or does only the lead developer get the “we?” Wouldn’t that make it more of an “I” instead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
6 points

It states that he is the “Founder of @GrapheneOS”, not the current lead developer. So I don’t get your point

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

I know Daniel somewhat from some years back, and calling him extremely toxic is just wrong. He is and has always been rather bad at communication under stress and is clearly on the spectrum in some way. Technically a genius person, but perhaps doesn’t have the right set of qualities to lead things, except from a strictly technical pov.

Very good decision from him to withdraw from social media. I hope he manages to contribute in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

is clearly on the spectrum in some way

This is not an excuse to behave the way he does.

Very good decision from him to withdraw from social media

He hasn’t, still on github, still on HN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So? Bad people can make good things. We should all stop using Linux because Torvalds is a dick?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

as long as they do good work i don’t give a shit what they think

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

might be toxic, but the os is brilliant

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Louis Rossman’s video describes his behavior in public spaces accurately: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4To-F6W1NT0

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments