lemm.ee

2 points

2 months ago

But aren’t you the one advocating that this is okay? Why do I need a trigger warning for something so deeply and obviously ethical?

report

[ - ]

0 points

2 months ago

your deeply biased YouTube video is notoriously traumatizing, with the production house that made it providing aftercare tips. viewers report sleeplessness, nightmares, vomiting, lack of appetite and depression.

you are acting irresponsibly

report

[ - ]

-1 points

2 months ago

I don’t have a problem with openheart surgery, but I don’t link videos of it without a tag

report

[ - ]

3 points

2 months ago

I feel like I’m being trolled right now. It’s a documentary which is expressly about the extensive, systemic animal abuse that happens in the industry, and the first instance of that is over 5 minutes in. Did you not expect gore? Is this not like the most fundamentally obvious thing you could possibly expect from such a documentary?

Edit: oh, comment history tells me that I am being trolled. Interesting. Have a nice day.

report

[ - ]

1 point

2 months ago

I know all about your YouTube video, but unsuspecting people could be triggered, and it is your responsibility to warn others when you endanger them.

report

[ - ]

1 point

2 months ago

They’re just filming what you paid for. You should’ve warned the camera crew of the documentary before endangering them.

report

[ - ]

0 points

2 months ago

I didn’t send them to make it. I didn’t pay them or anyone in the YouTube video.

report

[ - ]

1 point

2 months ago

So you’re telling me that you didn’t have to give the filmmakers a trigger warning that they’d see the animal abuse that you pay for and actively advocate for paying for? That in much the same way one might expect animal abuse going into a documentary on animal abuse, the filmmakers might have expected animal abuse going into the animal ag industry? Peculiar.

Your arguments are bad-faith nonsense, and I’m disengaging from this clownish conversation.

report