You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
14 points

Are we just discounting that Antarctica still has no permanent residents?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Antarctica can’t be the last place with a permanent settlement if it has no permanent settlement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It hasn’t happened yet so New Zealand is last. Give it a hundred years and we’ll have antarcticans

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Antarctica is land under ice, the arctic is water under ice. Antarctica used to be further north and major steps of evolution have happened there for stuff that isn’t flightless birds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Antartica is a continent, it would take a lot of heat to melt

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yep. It has some permanent research facilities but no permanent settlement.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 6.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 999

    Posts

  • 41K

    Comments