With a human face

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
38 points

Dln’t quote me on this, but from what I’ve heard, the Mercador projection became standard because it’s good for navigating since qit conserves angles. Draw a strait line depicting your current trajectory and another the trajectory that would get you where you want, measure the angle between them, and that’s the actual angle you need to turn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Yeah, it’s actually a really great map for its purpose of navigation, which is a pretty damn important aspect of map usage. I’m tired of everyone shitting on it because of that scene in west wing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s great for navigating at sea, but bad for looking at the world as a whole. Nowadays most people use maps for the latter; hence the complaints.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Sure, that’s why I qualified with “for its intended purpose”. It’s not a great classroom map but it is perhaps the most historically important projection. The problem is this idea of “Mercator bad” has entered public consciousness. For example, the start of this thread mentioned “how not-great the mercator is” without any such qualifications.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

because of that scene in west wing.

Which scene is that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

https://youtu.be/vVX-PrBRtTY?si=EJI98A0zZR6zkURc Im sure there were people who felt this way before this episode, but it really exploded in public consciousness afterward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Internet people pretending to have never seen a globe at school so they can be outraged by Big Greenland.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

In the Internet age, I believe Mercator remains standard because it’s easy, since image buffers and UI viewports are implemented as rectangular arrays. For example, when you click on the map the pixel coordinates can be converted to (lat, long) just by scaling, without having to do complicated coordinate transformations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What you see in stuff like Google Maps or OpenStreetMap isn’t plain Mercator, it’s a variant called “Web Mercator

And the US DoD doesn’t like it because it introduces even more deviations than plain Mercator.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It’s all about your intended use. If you want to use Google maps to get to work, the DoD has no problem with web Mercator on the maps backend that serves up your map tiles.

If you’re firing up Arcmap for a GIS project, using the map to navigate based on earth features, or making a reference map, of course the DoD or anyone else, wouldn’t want you to use web mercator

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

And no projection is perfect they all introduce weird things, like this equirectangular map which is not conformal or equal area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This one has been mentioned a few times: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kavrayskiy_VII_projection

permalink
report
parent
reply

Map Enthusiasts

!map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz

Create post

For the map enthused!

Rules:

  • post relevant content: interesting, informative, and/or pretty maps

  • be nice

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 339

    Posts

  • 3.9K

    Comments