You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
21 points

X = 100 → zero nutritious?
Why inverted?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I feel that a lot of posts lately have been very “ugly” in terms of data representation. Dunno what that’s about, or if it’s just me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

People upvote because they like the content of the data or how it supports their agenda, while forgetting that this community is supposed to be about judging the representation of it specifically. And that’s assuming they’re even paying attention to the community name in the first place, which many may not be.

It’s been a perennial issue both here and in r/dataisbeautiful as long as I can remember.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Try finding a genuinely oniony story on /r/nottheonion and not just a funny news article

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, isn’t that how it’s also done on the reddit sub by the same name for years?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Hope this helps:)

(The chart legend seems not to be placed properly, maybe that’s why they mirrored the chart.)

Oi, I noticed the vertical axis is logarithmic, the impact difference is bigger than I thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks :)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Data is Beautiful

!dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz

Create post

Be respectful

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 110

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments