Edit - This is a post to the meta group of Blåhaj Lemmy. It is not intended for the entire lemmyverse. If you are not on Blåhaj Lemmy and plan on dropping in to offer your opinion on how we are doing things in a way you don’t agree with, your post will be removed.

==

A user on our instance reported a post on lemmynsfw as CSAM. Upon seeing the post, I looked at the community it was part of, and immediately purged all traces of that community from our instance.

I approached the admins of lemmynsfw and they assured me that the models with content in the community were all verified as being over 18. The fact that the community is explicitly focused on making the models appear as if they’re not 18 was fine with them. The fact that both myself and one a member of this instance assumed it was CSAM, was fine with them. I was in fact told that I was body shaming.

I’m sorry for the lack of warning, but a community skirting the line trying to look like CSAM isn’t a line I’m willing to walk. I have defederated lemmynsfw and won’t be reinstating it whilst that community is active.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
180 points
*

For anyone wondering, this is lemmynsfw’s take on the situation.

On a personal level, the vibes are off. Their defense seems really defensive and immediately moves to reframe the situation as body shaming. There’s a difference between an adult who looks underage posting porn of themselves and a community dedicated to porn of adults who look underage. Reducing the latter down to body shaming seems like unfair framing to me.

permalink
report
reply
95 points

Did you check the community in question? I’m quite suprised to hear one could think that’s csam. To me it looks just like your typical low-effort onlyfans content. None of the models even looked “barely legal” but more like well over 20 in most cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

The community in question listed “child-like” in their sidebar until after this defederation. Gross.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

That’s a stumble, but it was because they copied and pasted the dictionary definition of “adorable” into the sidebar. The same community has more than two million members on Reddit and has been a staple for almost a decade. However, they simply wrote “It must be adorable.” instead defining adorable like Lemmy did, so there’s that.

Idk, it just seems weird to be outraged when everything is legal, consensual, and not even a fringe kink. This is like Australia banning small-titted pornstars in their late twenties in a recent project against CSAM, because these adults aren’t shaped in morally appropriate ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

When I checked their communities most were basically empty?

And I didn’t see a community that fits that description.

Edit: I did try to enable nsfw content and tried from other accounts I have on other instances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Your instance just deferedated from lemmyNSFW. You can’t see any new content there anymore with that account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Yeah. I don’t think they’re sincerely trying to “be inclusive”. I think they’re just trying to misuse progressive concepts to their own advantage.

They know full well what they’re doing. The fact that it isn’t legally CP is just a technicality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points
*

I think it’s really strange to call that a technicality. Adults with babyfaces and braces doing porn (which appears to be what this was about, as far as I can tell) is worlds apart from children being abused. Calling that a “technicality” is like saying the difference between a slasher movie and a snuff film is a “technicality.” People who watch slasher movies arent actually wanting to see snuff films deep down inside. And people who find adults with babyfaces attractive arent actually lusting after kids deep down inside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

They literally said in the post no one looks too young to be lusted after. Major red flag right there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points
*

I feel this needs to be clarified. The point is that anyone of legal age deserves to be lusted after if that’s what they want. You telling them “you look too young, no one is allowed to find you attractive” is a bit… fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

HEY ADA, THIS GUY ISNT FROM BLAHAJ, WHY ISNT HE CENSORED? I THOUGHT THIS WAS FOR BLAHAJ INPUT ONLY? WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD, ADA?WHY THE HYPOCRISY? I MEAN, WE ALREADY KNOW, BUT I WANNA SEE YOU SAY IT!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh please just shut up

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

“If someone made a community intended to fool people into thinking it was kiddy porn, that would be a real problem. If someone of age goes online and pretends – not roleplays, but pretends with intent to deceive – to be a child and makes porn, that is a real problem. Nobody here is doing that.”

JFC what a shitty take. Roleplay of CP is still fucking disgusting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

all Im seeing is you showing me them saying that they’re also not okay with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

!main@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

Community stats

  • 18

    Monthly active users

  • 229

    Posts

  • 4K

    Comments