The Federal Reserve has already launched a small test of near-instantaneous financial transactions. Every time they talk about payments as a future feature of X/Twitter, I wonder if they know that’s getting Sherlocked.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
42 points

Many countries, including those in the developing world, have had instant payments systems for years. They’re very convenient, especially those that provide an “overlay” service (usually coming with a standardized app) that allows sending money to registered phone numbers, without dealing with bank account numbers.

Characteristically, the US version of instant payments seems half-assed. It’s initially supported by only 35 banks (not including Citi and Bank of America). And it apparently does not provide a standardized overlay service. Many big financial stakeholders, including the credit card companies, no doubt view it as a threat and would be very happy if it does not catch on.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

It’s honestly amazing how quickly a lot of developing countries have embraced this stuff. Hell, even roadside hawkers in a country like India accept instant bank transfers. It’s ridiculous that the US is so far behind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, because corporations like PayPal and Meta lobby against it. They got it don’t worry about it.
/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, writing this from Western Europe Americans not being able to wire each other money instantly is so confusing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As far as an overlay service goes, Zelle basically fills that niche, and it’s increasing in popularity. I think FedNow is more for larger payments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Zelle still takes a few days to complete transfers in my experience

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It is hard to get away with the crimes the bankers and other big finance entities have grown accustomed to committing as a part of their day to day business with instant resolution. Read up on failing to deliver, or as entities like Citadel like to term it, “sold, not yet purchased", like they did to the tune of 60B dollars.

It is like selling someone a house that you don’t own and may not even really exist. They can do this because they have a time period in which they have some leeway before they have to deliver the “deed" so to speak. It goes deeper than that but that is a simplified high level overview of the scam.

Simply put, the stock market is all fake and nothing is valued appropriately because price discovery us impossible with naked shorting and the use of OTC and dark pools.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 555K

    Comments