Calls for special deal to be struck for NT, which has biggest funding gap between public and private schools

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
6 points

I’m not knowledgeable enough to be able to say whether the burden of funding for schools should be on states or the federal government, though at least with the states holding the majority of the burden it means that federal LNP governments aren’t totally fucking up education for everyone.

That said, the only acceptable funding model (regardless of where the money comes from) is a base rate per student no matter what school they’re in, then additional funding for public schools only.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

That’s a great way to destroy public education.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There is a public school system available to everyone. If people want to send their kids to private schools, they have every right to, but should be prepared to cover 100% of the expenses without any aid from the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

There is a public school system available to everyone.

That sounds like it should be the case, but it isn’t. The Catholic schools alone account for something like 20% of the Australian student population. If just those schools weren’t there, our existing education system would collapse. Like it or not, we all rely on the presence of independant schools in our community.

If people want to send their kids to private schools, they have every right to, but should be prepared to cover 100% of the expenses without any aid from the government.

This argument has been made before. In 1962, it lead to six Catholic schools in Goulburn to go on strike. The influx of 5,000 students on the public schools in the area demonstrated that independant schools save taxpayers money. Go have a read about it: https://www.robertmenziesinstitute.org.au/on-this-day/goulburn-catholic-school-strike

Imagine that on a national scale. And again, that’s just the Catholics. There is not capacity in the public system for every student in Australia. Not by a long shot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How can you consider Catholic schools “independent”?

And the idea isn’t too get rid of those schools, it’s to use the money that usually goes to these schools to fund regular public schools instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ll just leave you with some numbers. Here are school numbers (government, catholic, independent…). Please note the vast difference in number of government schools VS the rest. https://shorturl.at/tEPT6 (acara.edu.au)

Here is how much funding the education department provides this year: 10.6B for 6600 public schools and 16.4B for ~3000 of the rest. https://shorturl.at/bFH89 (education.gov.au)

All we need to do is fund public schools. Given the fact that Australia has a secular government and the catholic church pays no taxes, while still receiving taxpayer funded handouts it’s only fair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

No. If your school turns a profit you get nothing. No more corporate welfare

If your school mandates a religion you get nothing. God Will provide…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I am ok with the government giving money to private schools. I personally never went to one, and my kids don’t either.

But every kid is entitled to $x per year funding. Some parents are rich enough to contribute more above that, but they still entitled to the same government funding that every other kid gets.

You can’t on one hand say ‘tax the rich’, then a minute later deny them services. That would be unfair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sure, they are entitled to funding. At a public school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

But every kid is entitled to $x per year funding

According to the ABC, independent private schools average $10k per year per student and public schools $14k per year.

AFAIK The exact amount a private school gets depends on how affluent the families are estimated to be (estimated by the government - not the school).

The reality is if every kid went to a public school, we’d have to significantly raise taxes to cover the additional cost (we’d also have to open new schools). I’d probably be in favour of that, but not everyone would.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The rich people’s kids are entitled to public education.

If you make education system based on class you’re going to deepen the social divide. This is already happening. People in power will advocate for private schools because that is where their kids go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

then a minute later deny them services.

Which services are they being denied?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

People say this, but if we did as you suggest, there would be massive complaints that parents can’t freely choose their public schools due to catchments.

Further, it doesn’t preclude privates from charging extra on top, so you would still have a two tier education system as they private schools can attract the talent and teach only the best/easiest/richest students.

The fundamental issue of education is that if a school can choose its students, it will be a better school.

Our best public schools are basically either selective entry or just “happen” to be in suburbs with rich people or have a large population of Asians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah, and if parents want their kids to go to the private schools, let the damn parents pay for it. Not the government. The entire point is for the lion’s share of government funding to go to schools open to all (or at least all students within a catchment area) and who are bound to adhere to the same rules as every other government-funded school.

Private schools are already charging extra. Let them charge more. The only change is that those parents who do want to send their kids to private school will either have to pay the extra or accept that their kids will have to go to a public school.

The fundamental issue of education is that if a school can choose its students, it will be a better school.

It ultimately comes down to funding. Pretty much all of those ‘better’ public schools have more money than the others, mostly due to being in higher income areas and having parents who are able to contribute more, give to fundraisers, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The fundamental issue of education is that if a school can choose its students, it will be a better school.

It ultimately comes down to funding. Pretty much all of those ‘better’ public schools have more money than the others, mostly due to being in higher income areas and having parents who are able to contribute more, give to fundraisers, etc.

No I don’t think it’s funding at all. None of the things that make a good school cost much money. Sure, the fancy private schools have nicer uniforms, go on more excursions, have better sports equipment, etc, but none of that has much impact.

What really has an impact is allowing the school to choose its students. For example if a kid threatens to kill a teacher in a public school, they are politely told “don’t do that” and… that’s it. There’s basically nothing else the school can do. Not a hypothetical example by the way, it’s a real one. In a study a few years ago, 99.6 per cent of Queensland public school teachers claimed to have “experienced workplace bullying” and most of them were bullied by students. I know lots of teachers, and they back that up with their personal experience.

The official state school line is they have zero tolerance to bullying, but the reality is very different. The reality is the only real options the school has is to send the kid to another school, which doesn’t work because there’s often no other school in the catchment area, or send the kid to jail / juvenile detention, which is only an option for extremely serious offences. Bullying doesn’t get you sent to juvy (and it shouldn’t). All the school can really do is ask the parents to do something - but in reality most parents are far less equipped to deal with behavioural issues than a school teacher.

In a private school - those students are kicked out. That’s a real consequence and the result is better behaviour by students.

If basically every teacher has been bullied, that means every student is being bullied as well. I don’t want my kid to go through that shit if at all possible. Which is why I’d like my kid to go to a private school. Not because they have better funding, but because they can choose their students.

While there are some expensive private schools, a lot of them (e.g. the one a couple blocks from my home) are very affordable. It’s cheaper than sending a kid to childcare for example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Doesn’t matter how logical you are: the net effect is that in the immediate, some kids who could have gone to private schools (with great familial effort) won’t be able to and thus receive a lower quality education.

Will you sacrifice the quality of your kids education for the greater good?

History, cause we have seen all this before, says you won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Australia

!australia@aussie.zone

Create post

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you’re posting anything related to:

If you’re posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

  • When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn’t show Lemmy Moderators, I’ll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments