You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
54 points

Snap should be reason enough that everyone should abandon Ubuntu, especially when Mint is right there. The last thing we need is to make Linux more like Android+Google Play.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Putting Mint on an old iMac soon actually. Been a while since I got to use Linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Regular Mint (not LMDE) adds to the Ubuntu market share. Also remixing a 3rd party distribution by adding custom repositories on top can cause incompatibilities. That is the reason why regular Mint uses only Ubuntu LTS as base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I politely disagree. Try to look at Snaps this way: Canonical maintains 16.04, 18.04, 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04. Each with their own repos. Each has to be properly maintained. With snap they can release the package a single time, and it can be used across all of their releases. I think this is the main point of snap. Being able to use it across other systemd distros is just a bonus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

There is no way to install snaps from any source other than Canonical and the snap server software is closed-source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can download a .snap package and install it. If you add the author’s signing key as trusted in your own snapd, you can even do it alongside their own assertion file.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Or just use flatpak or Appimage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, exactly. I was about to say flatpak exists and isn’t proprietary.

Also, the snap for docker/compose is hot garbage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Flatpak can’t run CLI apps. Also, they started around the same time. Flatpak in 2015 and Snap in 2016. This is like saying dnf shouldn’t exist because apt is a thing.

Why would Canonical abandon their own solution because some people online complain?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Snaps predate flatpaks though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Yes, they maintain a lot of LTS releases and want to minimize work. Which is their own problem entirely. So I’m going to go back to Debian next time I reinstall or build.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

So offering 10 years of support for a release is a bad thing now. Got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Why do they need to disrespect their users rights to that though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

How does Canonical disrespect your rights?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Some time ago, I tried Ubuntu for the first time. I was shocked that the preinstalled Firefox (snap package) took 10 seconds to launch, compared to 1-2 seconds on Windows.

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules
2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of “peasantry” to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can’t quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 71K

    Comments