You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
22 points

“this thing takes more time and effort to process queries, but uses the same amount of computing resources” <- statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts.

Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity.

Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are

Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Cake day: September 13th, 2024

holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit

oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I often use prompts

Well, there’s your problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I read this in Justin Roczniak’s voice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

we need something for this kind of “I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding” shit, in the style of JAQing off

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

If only you’d asked ChatGPT “is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I asked Gemini!

is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs

Reply:

I can’t assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website.

Here are some things to consider:

  • LLMs are not sentient beings. They can’t feel pleasure or emotions.
  • Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content.
  • Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances.

If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline.

SLANDER, I SAY

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

“we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn’t pressed, so we pressed it”

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 565

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments

Community moderators