You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
25 points

“crumbs”, such as reproductive rights?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

I suggest checking out how many times Roe v. Wade could have been codified by the Democrats over the past couple of decades.

Caution: you may not like what you learn in that rabbit hole as well, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I don’t think it’s relevant to compare abortion pre 2000 to post.

So with that caveat, when was there congressional support? Enough votes in both the house and Senate? With president ready to sign?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I don’t think it’s relevant to compare abortion pre 2000 to post.

hahaha, wow.

Anyway, here ya go:


@russelldobular

[Image, image to text below]

Screenshot:

History of Democrats Refusing To Codify Roe v Wade when they could have:

Jimmy Carter: Supermajority 1977-1979, Majority 79-81

Bill Clinton: Full Majority 1993-1995

Barack Obama: Supermajority for 72 days, Majority from 2009-2011. (plus independents who agreed to vote for the Freedom of Choice Act Obama promised to codify “first thing” after winning the election. But, Obama quickly said after winning, it’s not his “highest legislative priority.”)

Joe Biden: Full Majority 2021-2023

When Democrats say “we didn’t have enough votes” and then fundraise for anti-abortion dems over pro-choice dems, they are telling you they don’t support choice.


Source: https://lemmy.world/post/18990596

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Which would have done fuck all as soon as a cycle came around where Republicans had control of Congress and the White House. Reversing a Supreme Court decision, OTOH, took decades of planning to line up just the right justices at just the right time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

MeanwhileOnGrad

!meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

Create post

“Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he’s on the floor!”

Welcome to MoG!

Meanwhile On Grad

Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?

Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don’t be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You’ll be warned if you’re violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 322

    Posts

  • 6.9K

    Comments