You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
305 points

So if YouTube is now serving up the ads directly to me, does that mean they’re finally liable for the content of those ads? Can we have them investigated for all the malware, phishing, illegal hate speech, etc.?

permalink
report
reply
75 points
*

No, because that would be communism, and that killed 100 million people. You also think genocide is bad, aren’t you? And besides of that, if there were less regulations, you could make your own video platform to challenge Google’s monopoly! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

i think people may have missed that you’re not serious

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Reading comprehension is for people who paid attention in school. Nerds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The problem with pretending to be a dumbass on the Internet, is it’s almost impossible to outdo the professionals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Poe’s law

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not possible for everyone to just tell if it’s supposed to be sarcasm. ADHD makes it hard. A bad day makes it hard. A tiring day makes it hard.

The downside of the misunderstanding isn’t just downvotes. It’s possibly a proliferation of misinformation and an impression that there are people who DO think that way.

Being not serious while saying something grim is not a globally understood culture either. It’s more common and acceptable in the Western world as a joke.

So… call it accessibility, but it’s just more approachable for everyone to just put an “/s”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Well… Communism is directly responsible for multiple famines that killed into the hundreds of millions. Then there are the inevitable purges that have taken millions of lives and hosts of terrors as well.

You’re free to dispute history if you need to, and claim that theoretically communism is nice, but in practice, history tells us that living under communism reaaaalllyy sucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This kind of messages should have a “/s” attached. IMHO, that’s just proper Netiquette.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I kind of inferred the /s by the end of the post, but respect that such inference isn’t universal. Also there are many /s comments that I wouldn’t infer if it wasn’t explicit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Netiquette

Now there’s a term I’ve not seen in many years.

And dates both of us, I expect… 😄

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This is a good question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Great, now it’s Russian roulette every time you hit that pause button. <clickPause> ¡BOOM ZERODAY MALWARE!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

No, at least not in the USA. They’re still protected under Section 230, which makes them immune from liability of third-party content on their platform.

now serving up the ads directly to me

What do you think they were doing before? 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Does anybody know how this will affect the EU?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

no because of sec 230 and publisher rights, they were still directly serving them before, the only difference now is that it’s tied into the video stream directly, rather than broken out as a second one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In the past they have always said that they aren’t transmitting the content and so it’s the responsibility of the transmitter of the data. Now the content at least appears to be coming from youtube not the advertisers. So I’m curious if that’s enough to make it fall under section 230 which would require that they make a good faith effort to remove “objectionable” content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

legally that’s the same as far as courts care.

The only thing that would change this is a ruling on advertiser responsibility. Or something tangentially related that would force them to properly regulate ads for example.

Ultimately i’m guessing unless youtube rolls their own in home ads, instead of allowing other advertising agencies to run their ads on youtube, it simply wouldn’t apply here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 529K

    Comments