You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-29 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The USSR was bad but it wasn’t communist. For that it would have had to have been stateless and classless, definitionally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Is it was so great, why did most of the conquered nations run west as fast as they could as soon as they could? Must have been because the USSR was so ‘progressive’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

implying that corrupt scumbag Brezhnev was a proper communist

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Progressive at first, but then sorta forgot about it.

At the start, women were given rights that suffragists in the UK or USA could only dream of. Then it stopped. By the 1960s, women in the USSR found that they were still expected to do all the same old household chores while also holding a job outside the home. Meanwhile, western feminism had developed a strong second wave, and later a third (arguably more since, but that gets complicated). Those waves dealt with increasingly abstract issues in the patriarchy, including the problem of household chores.

This simply didn’t happen in the USSR. Developing one would have required greater freedom of speech than anyone had in that country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There is such thing as an Authoritarian Left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I’m not sure it is. Like, yes, it does exist in the Left/Right, Auth/Lib political compass, but that’s just a model. The stance has some inherent contradictions.

And so does Right/Lib, for that matter. “Fiscally conservative/socially liberal” is a nonsense position, and those taking it tend to just be conservative in practice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I thought the political compass was itself just a popular perspective? It’s is a gross oversimplification of the ideas involved. Find me two leftists who even agree on what’s the farthest left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Ah, right, the old “communism has never been tried”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Tried a bunch, but tried wrong.

The Lenin model of communism is inherently flawed for one simple reason. An Authoritarian Communism is an Impossibility. It cannot exist by pure definition.

The true ideal communism is a stateless utopia.

So yeah, the Lenin model is flawed to the point of uselessness. Or worse because any authoritarian government is going to kill its own citizens, while also being a low grade threat to neighboring countries.

No. The only path to true communism is via democracy. And there are countries that are moving in that direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmer_humor@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 978

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments