Note: this article is from 08 September 2024.
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 5 points
*
There’s no “AI” involved. The authors quickly retreat from their misleading title to the sightly less misleading “deep learning”. Regardless of grifter terminology, we’re actually talking about a machine computing the statistics of images. That might be good for patients. But it’s got nothing to do with “artificial intelligence” or “seeing beyond humans”.
22 points