You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
59 points

What is the web integrity API?

permalink
report
reply
-24 points

It’s an API for web integrity. Thank me later

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

can you explain this further? what does this integrate that’s not yet integrated in web?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It makes sure you’re running an approved browser with an approved OS on approved hardware and Google controls it all.

Basically, say goodbye to Adblock, video downloaders, startup search engines, accessibility tools, and Linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Some fucking greedy cunts at Google having a vision of internet being accessible only by “approved”(Chrome) browsers/clients.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

They want to approve the whole environment, including os, even if virtualized or not

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The whole stack will need to be approved. approved browser running on approved OS on approved hardware. Good luck browsing on Linux. The end of user software choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

Basically drm for your browser

Fuck that though

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Notice they are DRMing text and computer code, WSJ and malware brokers are gonna really happy, everyone else had their DRM fix with multimedia

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points
*

this is the most batshit insane proposal… I hope nobody supports it

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Don’t worry, people will certainly make bypasses for that shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

if google microsoft and apple support it, that already covers over 90% of the market

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

and what kinda of thing does this protect?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d guess it’s first gonna be used for streaming TV shows and such. After that it’ll probably be used for absurd things

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Ads. To be precise this on it’s own provides a way for servers to be certain of the environment the pages run (browser, plugins, os). Protecting ads or other functions come from servers refusing unattested configurations or configurations they don’t like (i.e. running adblock, running firefox, running linux).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Malware, malware encrypts its code so researchers cant crack into it and antivirus cant anilize it. Google is accedentally sponsoring malware

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Orwellian doublespeak for DRMing and paywalling the web.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Orwell was never refering to the economics in 1984. It was a dystopia of an autocratic government in an ever autocratic world, that fully infected and controlled every aspect of everyones life. Whether that is for capitalism, or communism wasn’t part of it.

Also free capitalism is an oxymoron. Capitalism is inherently unfree and the less regulated it gets, the more imprisoning it becomes to the normal people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

V3 manifest got too much bad press so they had to hinder it’s ability to gimp ad block.

So now their trying another approach, this time they will probably develop and push this proposal out, and have multiple adopters before anyone can do anything about it. See also: WebHID.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

A system for websites to request a proof of the “integrity” of a user’s browser and underlying OS/hardware, and “attesters” to check this “integrity” and provide the proof. If that sounds vague, that’s because it is. What “integrity” means is for the “attester” to decide.

Google would of course be one of the major “attesters”, and could just deny the proof if you installed an ad blocker or VPN for example. In this case you would likely not be able to access the website anymore, because your device is deemed as “untrustworthy”. Or you’re using a browser that the big “attesters” don’t like, so you can’t get a proof either.

So it’s a way for big companies to decide who can still use big parts of the internet and who can’t, based on whether it would make them money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

every day that passes we are closer to the day using TOR is not an option.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 906

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments

Community moderators