You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

🤔 to my understanding DNA evidence is one of the very few things that is actually reliable when it comes to forensic science. What issues do you have with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Unfortunately your understanding, and that of nearly every juror in the US, is wrong. Tainted by the pro-police television narrative, that cops never mess up and that all crimes can be solved with the application of Forensic Science™. The link I provided elaborates further, but one reason from the concerningly long list: DNA testing really is little more than circumstantial evidence - it’s ridiculously easy for your DNA to show up at the scene of a crime you were not involved with. In general, it’s more precise than blood splatter or ballistic analyses, but not nearly by the margin you think.

permalink
report
parent
reply

fedia shitpost

!fediashitpost@fedia.io

Create post

fedia shitpost

Rules

tbd

Community stats

  • 774

    Monthly active users

  • 9

    Posts

  • 77

    Comments

Community moderators