You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points
*

I’m surprised there isn’t more movement to just completely ban building in these areas. Getting everyone else to cover the cost of their predictable destruction seems very unfair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think insurance companies pulling out of certain areas will amount to the same thing unless they are forced by regulators to provide coverage. If regulators do force that it will be a bandaid—states need to be starting relocation funds for climate impact

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The problem with that is “these areas” is more or less the entire state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I should have been more specific, I was just referring to the storm surge flooded areas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not seeing the problem

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators