You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-6 points

Non-participation is simply letting the greater evil win.

They’re not suddenly going to ditch first past the post because of some protest voters/abstainers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Dem supporters have been holding their noses for 50+ years and voting for the “lesser evil”. If that has brought us to this election, where your choice is between “genocide” and “genocide +”, isn’t it obvious that voting for the “lesser evil” just inevitably trends towards the greater evil over time? It is not a successful strategy at mitigating harm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This guy gets it

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

isn’t it obvious that voting for the “lesser evil” just inevitably trends towards the greater evil over time? .

What’s obvious is that multiple election cycles of non-participation lead to people who want the greater evil winning the vote more often.

It is not a successful strategy at mitigating harm

Counterpoint: literally any of the things that happened under Trump that Hillary almost certainly wouldn’t have done.

Like nominating three of the judges that overturned roe

We’ve been down that road before

What doesn’t happen is non-participation leading to the abolishion of America’s two party system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

“Over time” being the crucial detail. I’ll take every opportunity I can to buy time to slow the trend toward greater evil. Gives us time to get actual leftists into positions that will actually make them viable presidential candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Those 150+ years of bourgeois “democracy” (IE capitalist dictatorship) got the US to where it is now. Don’t worry tho, keep doing the same thing over and over again, the US just keeps improving. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Since you just did the thing they described but without addressing it, let me repeat them.

Why do you support a system that repeatedly makes you choose between mega hitler and giga hitler? Surely you recognize that such a system is evil and participation is an endorsement of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

So you’ve stopped paying taxes then? Since “such a system is evil and participation is an endorsement of it”

It’s those tax dollars that build bombs for Israel. If you’re paying them, you’re paying for genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So you’ve stopped paying taxes then? Since “such a system is evil and participation is an endorsement of it”

The MIC is funded through financial magic and imperialism. If tax fraud would oppose them, I would probably do it, but it really does not.

It’s those tax dollars that build bombs for Israel. If you’re paying them, you’re paying for genocide.

The “tax dollars” for the bombs are invented out of thin air. However, the people that make the bombs and deliver the bombs and drop the bombs are doing all of those things and we should organize to stymy those efforts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Because if Giga Hitler wins, then the Overton window shifts even farther, and the next election is between Giga Hitler and Hyper Giga Hitler Zero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It shifts right under both because the population does not build leverage against either but both Hitlers eschew anything vaguely left.

permalink
report
parent
reply

What would you call a machine that routinely and predictably produces evil outputs with marginal differences between them? How reliable of an evil-producer does this machine have to be before you recognize that the production of a certain type of evil is the machine’s purpose?

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 32K

    Comments