https://midwest.social/post/18536008
Edit of yesterday’s meme with accounted for non-voters
3 points
*
I just don’t think it’s useful. Trying to argue against a non consequentialist ethical position with consequences is like beating your head against the wall. It’s just an endless circular argument.
5 points
Sometimes people ignore consequences because they simply haven’t thought through the consequences. That’s a very normal human thing. Laying it out this way can persuade some people.
Some people might even become consequentialist when shown the consequences they hadn’t fully considered before.
