You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
6 points

Lmao yeah that would def happen, with -25% income as well right?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Have you not been reading articles on this topic? Yes, we are talking about a 32 hour work week with no loss in pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We can then spend the other 3 days of the week working a second job for +75% pay, hurray!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points
*

Options should be 40 hours, 10 hour days, not 32 hours total. That ends up a lot less income.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Did you even read the article you shared? It’s still 8 hour days, the workweek would become 32 hours

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

There were a few stories today on this. 32 hours is too short. I’d be bored.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This entire topic is about shortening the work week without any loss in pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

…I don’t see how that would be better in any way than what we currently have, I wouldn’t be up for that at least

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 414K

    Comments