Downvotes can be a useful tool to shape a community, but one of the main issues brought up in the post I made is when several people start downvoting communities they don’t even participate in. Which I want to emphasize is NOT the correct way for downvotes to be used.

First id like to start off with an apology to those who are upset about them being enabled. It may seem very clear to you that downvotes weren’t wanted, but as an admin I get complaints for basically every decision made on this site, so what the “right” choice is, is sometimes hard to determine.

I’ve been getting complaints about downvotes being disabled for awhile now, so it wasn’t clear to me. Even now, the opinion is still very split. Which is why I enabled them quietly to see if it would cause any issues. It did, so I made the initial post to see if people think the issues created by downvotes outweigh the benefits, and what peoples’ other opinions about them are.

This is my opinion based on what I’ve read and the results of the poll:

I think at a later time when lemmynsfw is larger, downvotes may be viable, especially if lemmy implements a custom home feed so that not everyone sees the same posts. This would help mitigate the issue of people not in communities downvoting posts. But as it stands I think the best option is disabling them again. Frequent posters, which are kind of needed for this site to survive, don’t seem to like them, and the poll is split almost 50/50. I have to try to balance enjoyability of posting and enjoyability of consuming content on the site, and it just seems like downvotes really hurts posters and only marginally helps consumers.

So with all that said, downvotes have been disabled again. Sorry for all the confusion and back and forth.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
10 points

Really disappointing decision. I’m tired of blocking so many niche (to say the least) communities polluting the local feed.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

You’re quite literally proving their point. You’re not meant to downvote things you don’t like to see. Your argument is also completely flawed. A block is a one time thing per community. So how are you tired of this? Without a block you’d be downvoting every single post that comes up from said community, which is constant work, which you somehow would not be tired of? Unless of course it is your goal to bully away the people from said community so they don’t post anymore at all, which again, just proves the point of downvotes being a tool for harassment. Maybe take some time to self reflect on your own behavior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If people stuck to existing communities, that would be one thing. I block a community for topic x, then a user makes a new community for topic x, so my block doesn’t hide it. Now I have to block the new community.

This happens every day. Every day I ask myself didn’t I already block that community? The answer is no. It’s a new community about a thing I’ve already blocked a dozen times. A person who creates a new community only marginally different than an existing one deserves downvotes for doing so. Otherwise you’re just enabling spam trolls to overtake everyone’s feeds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can say the same thing about instances. Maybe there’s a reason someone made a community that follows the same topic? For example, a lot of new communities may be alternatives to those hosted on the Tankie instances, like .ml.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well yes and no. Your are meant to downvote things you don’t like to see, that’s the whole point of voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You don’t make sense. You’ve been told by me and even one of the admins that that’s not what you’re supposed to do. If you don’t like the content of a certain community, like those posting AI content, then you block said communities. Downvoting them would have 0 effect on you and your feed, other than being a waste of your time. Downvoting does not make the posts go away, it does not hide them, it just is a much bigger effort than just blocking the community, for literally no actual effect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

downvotes aren’t meant to be used as “I don’t like this entire community’s posts” if you don’t like a community, then block it, rather than downvoting a post that is in an appropriate community that the people subscribed to that community will like

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not downvoting a community but posts. AI community posts are not something I want to see and polute my feed. I block and/or downvote. Lately blocking has been very tiring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Have you considered to just use the subscribed timeline rather than local or all?

Because to be honest with you, that would be:

  • Far simpler
  • Far more effective
  • Far less of a dick move towards others in this online community.
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

2 additional AI communities blocked since yesterday. What will happen when they will flood the instance?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You could join the communities you’re interested in, and then browse those. Then you’ll just get the stuff you like, and you won’t need to block.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Thankfully it’s easier to block a user than it is to create an account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

True

permalink
report
parent
reply