lemm.ee

https://fightthenewdrug.org/resources/

-1 points

1 year ago

report

[ - ]

Corhen@lemmy.world

0 points

1 year ago

I mean, you linked an entire website, I guess that’s a bit better thank just linking google, but doesn’t give me any specific info about your claims.

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

I specifically linked a list of resources that are well cited. The original topic is multiple points, so this is evidence for each one, unless you want to discuss a specific item.

report

[ - ]

Corhen@lemmy.world

1 point

1 year ago

Well, why don’t you chose one or two items from your list, and then show me a peer reviewed study proving it!

I don’t view “I made so many different claims that I can’t bother proving any specific one” as a great argument.

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

As I just said above, there’s too many points in the original article. Texas requires multiple warning labels and each one has some backing. Why don’t you pick ONE topic and we can discuss it.

report

[ - ]

Corhen@lemmy.world

0 points

1 year ago

So, you make a claim, asked to provide any proof of any single one, and go “nah, you do it for me, I’m too lazy”

I’m sorry, that’s just not a convincing argument!

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

Sigh. I guess I’ll have to spell it out for you. The article says porn “potentially biologically addictive, is proven to harm human brain development, desensitizes brain reward circuits, increases conditioned responses, and weakens brain function.” Or, that exposure to porn “is associated with low self-esteem and body image eating disorders, impaired brain development, and other emotional and mental illnesses.”

I’m not going to debate each and every one of them, so I offered YOU the choice to pick ONE of those aforementioned topics to discuss at a time. The ball is on your court, and you’re whining that im not engaging with you.

report