You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
33 points

Was there any advantage to having it lean like that?

permalink
report
reply
64 points

In defensive terms, no, not really. They had to build it like this because these aren’t really walls per se, it’s just brick lining on the outside of an earthen mound, and mounds are, well, mound-shaped. https://gomadnomad.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Bukharas-Ark-Palace.jpg

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It would’ve made siege ladders harder to set up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Who needs siege ladders when you can just climb up the damn wall?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’d think there’d be a reason beyond construction requirements, though—otherwise someone in the past 1,500 years would have replaced it with a more conventional wall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They did. This is only the oldest, innermost fortification in the city. AFAIK additional layers of walls were build around it later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Is it a lean, or is it wider at the bottom?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This question confuses me geometrically

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

is it \ or △ shaped ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not this one, but newer forts were built with angled walls to help protect against canon balls and the like.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But there the walls were still vertical to the ground yeah?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
7 points

Harder to knock down or undermine?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

You’d think it would lean the other way to make bit harder to climb.

Edit: or this could be a view from the inside. Or maybe the goal is to keep people in rather than out.

Edit again: none of these things seem true according to Wikipedia. It’s curved inwards and it houses the rich, so it seems to just be aesthetics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are we sure they built it like that 1500 years ago? Churches can suck down in the span of only a few hundred years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wikipedia says it was built around the 5th century

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The whole thing is basically a wall-clad hill. heaping one stone onto another is something they managed even thousands of years ago. And the climate (it is an oasis in the desert) is dry enought to keep it from eroding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well clearly it’s because the castle defenders of that era were quite sophisticated, but simply don’t dance they just pull up their pants and do the rockaway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Harder to get on the wall would be my guess

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Seems to me it’d be a lot easier to scale this incline than a vertical wall

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s gregnant

permalink
report
parent
reply

Mildly Interesting

!mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

Create post

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it’s too interesting, it doesn’t belong. If it’s not interesting, it doesn’t belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh… what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don’t spam.

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 543

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments