You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
78 points
*

A lot of conservatives aren’t playing by the same rule book. They don’t care that Trump committed crimes because they only care that he achieves their desires goals. All the outrage and confusion when conservatives support terrible people is missing the point. They aren’t hypocritical when they try to call out others, because they don’t really care that someone else committed a crime. They only care that they win.

It’s not a contradiction to them when they cry about pedophiles and then vote for one. Crying about pedophiles was just a tactic to try and gain power and further their goals.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

It’s almost like we should never, ever trust the word of a conservative. Never.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Tack “religious leader” on there too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They seem to have skipped the “one nation” part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They think that they can create an authoritative system and rules that will bring people in line and create one nation under their values (while disregarding the rules of the current system).

They know that it won’t be supported by everyone, but they assume that the problems will come mainly from the groups they want to purge anyways. That’s why they get so pissed off when they see “members of their group” supporting the groups they hate and have shit like “race traitor” in their vocabulary. They think there’s a brotherhood that doesn’t really exist between people who look similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They think that they can create an authoritative system and rules that will bring people in line

Sometimes it just seems that they were raised on authoritative media (including the TV news and radio they admire). First, the Levant stories about voices from the sky and burning bushes. Then Trump is famous for his TV personality of “you’re fired!” commandments. Rick Roderick’s 1990’s descriptions help me with the words: “And on a Freudian account, it’s not accidental that that’s the time you reach out for large and invisible fathers to protect you… and mothers. And you know what, that’s elegant suspicion. It is not an argument; it’s an elegant suspicion. In fact when you look at the iconic significance of churches, you know the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost, the family values stuff, you know… I mean, I hate to sound cynical, but as Freud says, they whole thing is so patently infantile. So obviously infantile, that to anyone with the love of humanity it’s just sad to think that most people will never rise above this view of life.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
3 points

While an interesting map, the US is much more divided by rural vs urban considerations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So here’s my perspective on that: In 1954 “they” tied “one nation under god” together. So to me, if your don’t worship their god, then you’re not part of their nation. It gets even more fucked up when its scrutinized what they actually worship in real world practice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/SZ2L-R8NgrA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And let’s be really clear - the GOP being the party o crime isn’t a new thing. Nixon got elected by interfering with US negotiations in Vietnam. Got pardoned through GOP bullshit too. Reagan got caught dead to rights on Iran Contra, but Bill fucking Barr came along and made sure there were no consequences for him OR George Bush. Finally, Bush’s kid invaded an entire country based on lies. And there’s never any consequences. They’re simply devolving into pettier bullshit to crime about.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments