161

What types of services are you not willing to self-host?

posted
by
Avatar
Tinnitus@lemmy.world
in
Avatar
selfhosted@lemmy.world
124 comments
hidereport

For example, something that is too complex for your comfort level, a security concern, or maybe your hardware can’t keep up with the service’s needs?

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
SocialDoki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
8 points

I think that’s what’s kept me at KeePass rather than moving to something like Bitwarden. Since it’s file-level encryption, anything that can serve files can also serve my KeePass database. When I upgrade servers or change to different services, restoring my database is as simple as throwing the file into that new service and going on with my life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
somedaysoon@lemmy.world
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 81K

    Comments

Community moderators