Defense contractors are forced to ramp up production but want long-term government guarantees of sales.

Business fears that they may expand production, but there will be no demand in three to five years.

Also, the lack of semiconductors and other problems with logistics have led to the fact that the order is three times longer than before the start of the conflict.

I thought we were told that it was all about protecting democracy and a free world, turns out it’s all about money.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
0 points

So, aggression (USA doesn’t defend) contractors want more war?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Specifically, they don’t want to spend a bunch of money creating factories if the war ends soon since they wouldn’t make a profit on that. So, either there’s going to be a long war or they’re not interested.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

So are they basically threatening them with peace? By saying if they don’t have a long war they won’t produce enough weapons to continue said war they want, thus ensuring the war ends?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Shit. The people in charge are psychopathic enough to offer exactly that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But paradoxically the means to ensure a long war don’t exist because a long war hasn’t been assured.

I think the business press breaking with the “slobber zucchini” crowd means institutional support will break before the arms manufacturers get contracts and assurances.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Death to NATO

!ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

For posting news about NATO’s wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

  • Follow Site Rules

  • No support nor defence of Western-backed governments, NATO or Western Imperialism

Community stats

  • 210

    Monthly active users

  • 683

    Posts

  • 4.8K

    Comments