Any chance of limiting global warming to 1.5˚C rests on Joe Biden being elected to a second term. Voters need an accurate accounting of Biden’s climate record ahead of the November 2024 election.

If you’re in the US and want to get involved, you can volunteer or give to the Biden Victory Fund

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
28 points

Any chance

Gotta disagree, we could for example elect someone who is an actual leftist and won’t drop build back better’s agenda because of some senate parliamentarian nonsense, or who won’t hand Joe Manchin a new gas pipeline during record heatwaves.

But yeah sure, Biden is our only hope 🙄

permalink
report
reply
20 points

The structure of the US electoral system means that we’re not going to get some third party to the left of the Democrats winning the Presidency any time soon.

Biden’s about as good as we can get right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

And so it goes in perpetuity.

How many degrees warmer does it have to get before we say enough and demand real leadership and accountability to the people above the dollar?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The strategy that works is winning primaries within the Democratic party. You can see that happen in NY for example, where the DSA candidates won several primaries in the state legislature, creating a meaningful shift in what kinds of laws passed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Probably right up until one of those super hurricanes the size of North America wipes the USA right off the map.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If you still believe in voting you are driving us off the cliff. You are actively destroying our planet. Yes, you specifically are guilty too. Biden is not going to save anybody without civil resistance either. There is a lot better than Biden and if you don’t want to argue for that then you are dooming the world to catastrophe. We have to get better than Biden, otherwise we might as well just lie down and give up right now.

The point is: Biden might be all we (or you, I’m German) get, but he is not enough. You MUST see that, right? If the US electoral system is incapable of avoiding climate catastrophe, are you really going to look back, satisfied you tried everything, or do you consider means outside of just voting every couple of years?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I worry that the only way to escape this nonsense two party system is for one party to lose enough that people start waking the fuck up that there are other, better options. Maybe if Trump / Desantis is electric then we’ll stop boiling frogs and get legitimately good candidates in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The two-party system exists in the US because of how elections are run. In particular, most states decide who wins an election by who gets the most votes in the general election. So when you have a third party in the mix, it serves as a spoiler, tipping the election to the people that it disagrees with the most. A few examples:


Example 1: D: 10 R: 9 I: 0

The Democrat wins


Example 2: D: 9 R: 9 I: 1

Tied election, with outcome decided by a coin flip or other game of chance


Example 3: D: 8 R: 9 I: 2

The Republican wins


The model which lets you change outcomes when elections are run like this is to take over a party from the inside. That means running candidates in the primaries in safe districts, and then backing them with money and volunteer hours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

“But we have to pick someone more moderate so we can compromise with the Republicans!”

Fuck no we don’t. If they field their most extreme and we field our most moderate only one thing happens. I yearn for a future where Bernie was elected instead and even he’s too damn old for this shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I yearn for a past where Al Gore won the election in 2000.

Or perhaps, one where the republicans didn’t steal it (legitimately, not like Trump’s claims) is more accurate, I suppose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe if we drag the Overton Window far enough to the right, it’ll come back around on the left?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You just end up in a pure fascist state with no way out when you do that. Not a good move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I yearn for a future where Bernie was elected instead and even he’s too damn old for this shit.

You realize that unfortunately, that isn’t our future right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe not your future with that attitude. /J

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

How do you propose to elect somebody like that? Somebody well to the left of Biden would lose the center, and hence the election.

Elect the progressives in Congress, where they stand a chance and can influence legislation. Put a moderate in the White House because we can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We need to foster a much larger, and longer scale ambition: democratic reforms.

Ranked choice voting, an end to the electoral college, greater participation in local elections, and campaign finance reform are the primary avenues that come to mind.

I don’t disagree that we should elect progressives to congress, but if the problem is structural, the solutions must be too. And they must be things that can overcome the current structural barriers. So obviously electing a third party candidate can’t be a solution to the barriers to that prevent third party candidates, for instance.

But direct democracy ballot measures, for instance, can be used to institute ranked choice voting, and state legislatures can be used to compel more democratic measures on local elections, which can then foster the generation of politicians who built a populist base and are more likely to expand the franchise to the state level once they rise in their careers.

Don’t forget: overturning Roe was believed impossible, but the people who wanted to do it spent 50 years building the tools to build the tools to build the tools to do the impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Yeah, it will take structural change, and the way to pull that off is to elect people to state legislatures and to congress who will actually work to make it happen. It doesn’t happen otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You do it by framing the debate around meaningful policy changes, and immediately delivering on those changes at every opportunity to do so. Progressive policies will meaningfully improve people’s lives in almost every way. Force those centrist voters to think. Clearly paint a picture of the vast wealth inequality that exists between the elite and normal Americans. Force them to ask themselves why other candidates don’t want them to have better pay, more time with their families, free access to the best medical care, and free access to higher learning to improve themselves and learn new skills. These things are the “bootstraps” repugs love to harp on about, and progressives must lead the charge in enabling our people to take hold of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d love to elect someone like that, but they’d have zero chance.

Not unless you have some incredible plan a la the ground-game Barack had that gave him such a surprising win in 2008.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Shout out to Cornell West.

And before anyone picks a fight: I would vote for Biden if my vote made the difference between him and Trump, but we won’t get anything from Biden unless we apply demands and pressure. We would not have any of Biden’s climate legislation if he wasn’t afraid of losing Bernie’s voters. We absolutely need West running, or electing Biden will accomplish very little.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The US is in a position were they have to choose between eating a turd or shooting themselves I the head every presidential election, this isn’t new.

Also I heard the democrat party aren’t even doing elections within the party. Like that sounded illegal to me until I found out your parties are also corporations which sounded very American. But even with that you don’t have a good choice cuz the alternative is death, so gobble the turd.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators