You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

If I read correctly, they’re just complying. If they don’t want to pay, they need to filter out the content. It’s not really retaliation, but following the law

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

From what we saw in earlier reports, the draft regulations haven’t even been gazetted for consultation yet.

It sound like Meta is acting preemptively to put pressure on the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

It sound like Meta is acting preemptively to put pressure on the government.

There isn’t much pressure to exert. C-18 has already received Royal Assent. The people of Canada have spoken, and this is what they want. Given that this is what Canadians have proclaimed as being what they want, why would Facebook wait?

If homicide laws were being introduced for the first time, and not yet in effect, are you going to kill a few people while you still can? Or are you going to realize that people don’t like being murdered and conclude that maybe you should not do that even if the law still technically allows?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The law has been passed but the actual regulations are to come.

It seems this is more about Meta not wanting to be subject to laws or courts of other countries.

The Australian version of the law would have given the minister power to designate firms, this one requires a more transparent process under regulation that would determine which firms are subject to the tax.

Some observers say that this was key point for Meta because it doesn’t want to accept being subject to legislation by any country outside the US on any issue.

Legislation that uses designations by ministers or Cabinet have been an issue for Canada in the past in trade relations with other countries. Foreign investment reviews. These were claimed to be not transparent decision processes.

What evidence do we have that this is about not wanting to accept Canada having legal authority?

There have been cases where Canadian courts have made court orders on Meta and Google and they have not complied because they claim the Canadian courts do not have jurisdiction. They claim they are only subject to the law of California and the US. As examples, there have been cases where Canadian courts have ordered access to the Facebook and Google accounts of deceased persons and they have not complied.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ahh can’t believe I missed that it wasn’t enacted yet - thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The legislation had Royal Assent, but coming into force and the publication of final regulations and, in turn, their effective date are yet further steps.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Canada

!canada@lemmy.ca

Create post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 54K

    Comments

Community moderators