You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

I wonder what’s this “good software” (you meant language?) that doesn’t require an IDE to code efficiently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I disagree somewhat with their take, but there’s definitely languages that cmoe with features built-in that reduce the need for a fancy IDE. For example, instead of null checks via annotations that the IDE has to parse and warn about, just have nullable types. Or instead of IDE features to generate a bunch of boilerplate, just don’t require that boilerplate.

That being said, on the other side of the spectrum, anyone writing code without using an LSP is just throwing away productivity by the handfull.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Good luck ever doing anything embedded if you always need a clunky IDE. Best thing I ever did was get comfortable in a solely vim/cmake/gcc environment. Even if the majority of work doesn’t require it, it’ll teach you a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, we’re rewriting everything in Rust, so there’s no need to learn cmake anymore /s

To conter your comment a little bit, I think anyone doing coding for a living should absolutely use an editor that supports LSPs. They’re an insanely helpful tool with zero downsides.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmer_humor@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

Community stats

  • 3.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments