You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
103 points
*

It seems most people don’t understand what power of attorney means. It gives her daughter the ability to make decisions* on her behalf, yes, but doesn’t grant any sort of conservatorship over her.

It’s an intelligent move, especially when a person gets older, to grant PoA to someone you trust. It means if, for example, you’re in the hospital, that person can still do things like pay your bills from your accounts.

EDIT: *legal, personal decisions - not senate votes. It doesn’t give the daughter any right or ability to do her job.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

I just wish she would make the intelligent move of resigning.

Or that she would have stepped down after her last term. Or an earlier one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

RBG should have had the foresight to do this as well. It’s a sad state of affairs we’re in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

RBG really shat on her legacy with that bullshit. At the end, she was just a power hungry narcissist like all the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’d like that too, the reality though is that she is the deciding vote on the judiciary committee right now and if she steps down the republicans will refuse to seat a replacement halting any confirmations… So right now they feel like they have to Weekend at Bernies her in order to keep confirming judges. Politics sucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You are right, but it’s only smart if you anticipate being incapacitated for long periods of time. We shouldn’t have lawmakers in the position to expect to be incapacitated for long periods of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s a good idea for just about anyone really since you can choose to only allow power if you’re incapacitated. The answer is to have and use a process to remove these geriatrics from office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s honestly good to have in place regardless. You never plan to get into an accident and into a coma.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Exactly. I have PoA for my parents, but I’ve never exercised it. My father is in care due to dementia, but my mother is in fine mental and physical health. The PoA is primarily there in case a decision needs to be made for my father’s care but my mother isn’t available for any reason. Doesn’t have to be medical reasons, mom always has the care facility make a note of the PoAs when she travels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah a couple of years ago my parents went through all that paperwork. They have each other as first in line for power of attorney, and then I’m the second.

Hell, I got my power of attorney done at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, I’ve been seeing a lot of sensationalist posts from this user tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe Certainly a dumb question, but does this mean her daughter could vote on Diane Feinstein’s behalf?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No. Which I think is where a lot of people are confused. It doesnt give the daughter any power or ability to do her job for her. Only to handle legal issues on her behalf.

Think, basically, things that she could otherwise hire a lawyer to do for her. She cannot outsource her senatorship.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 414K

    Comments