You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points

Honest question: Is it really accurate to characterize funding for a public utility or service as a bailout? Or are taxpayers just getting value for their tax money?

I would think a bailout would be when we’re giving public money to a for-profit entity that massively mismanaged itself.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I mean there’s a decent case that BART hasn’t been managed very well. I’m a big supporter of public transit but I worry that there won’t be enough oversight for this money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Is it really accurate to characterize funding for a public utility or service as a bailout?

No, it’s not. Consider: We don’t refer to highway funding as “bailing out” the automobile industry, for instance; even though the automobile industry couldn’t very well sell very many cars if there weren’t highways to drive them on.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Bay Area

!bayarea@lemmy.world

Create post

Discussion for all things Bay Area.

Community stats

  • 140

    Monthly active users

  • 244

    Posts

  • 756

    Comments

Community moderators