lemm.ee

0 points

1 year ago

I’m not sure if this is your first time using threaded conversation based software but that’s really not how a thread works.

report

This is what I see in Jerboa.

[ - ]

APassenger@lemmy.world

1 point

1 year ago

Is that not the first response to OP on this branch?

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

Please see my previous response.

report

[ - ]

APassenger@lemmy.world

1 point

1 year ago

Is this a point about using the word, “branch.”

Or you pointing out that conversation organically drifts? Or something else?

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

It’s point about the fact that comments on a post are all part of the topic of that post and using the word ‘branch’ to try and infer that this is somehow a whole new subject under discussion is daft. Why do you think so many communities have ‘stay on topic’ as one of their rules?

report

[ - ]

APassenger@lemmy.world

1 point

1 year ago

I was going a different route. You’ve only policed the topic in a specific direction (that I’ve seen).

You’re not obligated (and it would look Quixotic) to police every comment. But you sure took on a handful.

I haven’t seen that the mods care. I’ve seen that you do as do some others, but what I see is discussion branching from different elements of the original submission. Like what happens on threaded discussion boards.

Lemmy is for discussion, those will sometimes wind around in a stream of (group) consciousness way. I understand some optics issues with bringing up the app, but it was in the original submission. People on both “sides” took the mention of the app and commented completely divorced from the state aim of the post. While those that mentioned the app and were on topic - those you policed.

If the mods care to force narrow conversation, that’s up to them.

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

‘policed’ - lol :)

I genuinely don’t give a shit about what app anybody uses. I’m not anti or pro any particular app. Feel free to go through my comment history and you’ll see mention of Sync in this and only this thread. Why?

Because a) I don’t give a shit what app people use and b) this isn’t a thread about Sync. The fact that the word ‘Sync’ appears in the title and body is used in an illustrative way to highlight the fact that Lemmy as a piece of software was developed by two guys who were given a grant. It needs funding via donations. Instance owners also need funding via donations. If these two things don’t happen Lemmy goes away. That’s the point of this thread, irregardless of what language or words were used. I’m not OP so I can’t say why they chose to use Sync as an example.

When Sync users jump in to tell everyone how much they love Sync, that detracts from the point of the thread. It dillutes it and all of a sudden everyone’s talking about Sync, not what the thread subject is about. OP and a couple others tried to go through this thread telling Sync posters that that wasn’t the point of thread. Then Sync posters got annoyed and we started getting the ‘I just want to use Sync’, ‘why do you care?’ comments. So we responded to those too.

Mods are only going to step in if a thread gets nasty, which it hasn’t. It’s just very very frustrating to see a thread hijacked by people who want to talk about how great an app is in a thread designed to draw attention to the fact that Lemmy as a piece of software and instance owners - both of which any app absolutely requires in order to function - need support.

If you or anyone else wants to talk about Sync in a positive or negative way then I’m sure there are communities you can do that in. There’s absolutely no need to enshittify a thread that has absolutely no bearing on Sync (or any other app) as a piece of software, especially when that thread discusses a subject as absolutely vital to the continued existence, growth and maturation of Lemmy as this.

report