The Indian rice export ban, the war in Ukraine and El Niño are combining to create a “doom loop” for the world’s poorest people, as staple food prices soar.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
82 points

Referring to the potential starvation deaths of a large group of people as a positive for climate change is like saying you’re glad someone died early from a car accident instead of suicide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
5 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/JwI2NrVYqIE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

This bot needs to die, or at least be upfront about what it is. I’m fine with piracy, but don’t dress it up as “privacy respecting open source”. If you don’t agree with Youtube’s model, then just don’t use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Yes, but im just a very positive thinker today!

(is irony dead? Does everything need the /s? Are people so insane they think someone would writing that in a serious note…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Honestly? Yeah, I thought you were serious, because I’ve seen that attitude expressed before. Generally it’s more “this hazy, unspecified population can be sacrificed to help me deal with the existential dread that me and my world are walking off a cliff” than “dear me I so DO delight in death”, but it makes my teeth ache.

Thank you for clarifying, and I’m sorry for jumping on you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I didn’t think he was serious, fwiw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

For real? (serious) a nuclear war might be beneficial because mostly citys of big polluters will be taken out, starvation always hits those that already basically don’t pollute. So that argument would make 0 sense regardless…

And i don’t think a nuclear war is exactly what we want… There are better ways than to suicide on species level…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

From the rest of your comment history? Yes, it’s entirely believable. It’s more surprising that you’re walking it back, really.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Eh, the way it was written I wouldn’t have read it as sarcasm. Text and tone yada yada. That said, I’ve definitely seen people who seriously think like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

For real? (serious) a nuclear war might be beneficial because mostly citys of big polluters will be taken out, starvation always hits those that already basically don’t pollute. So that argument would make 0 sense regardless…

And i don’t think a nuclear war is exactly what we want… There are better ways than to suicide on species level…

Edit to clarify that im not in favor of nuclear war…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Literally no way to discern whether it was a sarcastic joke or if you were legitimately an eco-fascist

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

My entire existence is basically a joke so don’t take me too serious.

In general its a better approach to think everything on the internet is satire until clarified that its not, way better for your believe in humanity, trust me.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments