Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it’s actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that’s really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
172 points

After an entity reaches an annual cap (say $5m profit), 95c of every dollar should be taxed

permalink
report
reply
57 points

Give em a “you won capitalism!” Participation trophy 🏆 too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And a hearty handshake and a high five. Then start selling their assets and departments to competitors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

As it once was with FDR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

If other nations can have billionaires and we can’t, and our country is vast and rich, we will be at a disadvantage.

The WANT of money is corrupting itself. Actually having the money itself is not needed. People who want money will destroy your little system, and throw your country into chaos, ruination and poverty, united by a conspiracy of common interests.

I would rather just regulate what needs regulating, within reason, with a gentle hand, and only a strong hand with the worst of violations. For the record, I would be much harsher than the us has tended to be when it comes to pollution, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No. Fuck them. They can leave.

They will still do business in your country.

Also countries should tax companies on money that goes out of the country based off of their overall profit. So if Google makes 10% profit over costs the. We charge them 30% tax on the money they funneled out of Australia. Done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Fair enough…

I don’t think you can truely regulate any system we currently know in favour of the populace. So I take the us Vs them approach.

Each to their own 😎

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Gonna need tons of capitals controls to prevent money from leaving, rich people are good at moving. To what end? So the federal government gets even more money to spend on subsidies, police riot gear & highways. They’d turn the Pentagon into an octagon before they’d meaningfully help their citizens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah it’s not the only thing that would need to change for sure… I didn’t want to get too crazy here 😝

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I definitely think 50%, like they supposedly do in China. No exceptions. You try to evade it, you go to jail for six months, enjoy. I think that’s what happened to Jack Ma.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It should scale up like it did in the USA

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Anything would be alright with me, I’m in Australia and so I’m definitely warped with my international tax views. Probably why i’m at the extreme end of the scale

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

95% would also be fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Make that 100c. Fuck them. Nobody needs that much money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I would like 95% of your dollars, please. If we get to arbitrarily rob people who make more than we do, I’d like something from you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lol… keep growing

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 319K

    Comments