You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point
*

Except that mathematics mostly isn’t a “casual model generating precise predictions”, especially at the higher levels, famously so with the philosophical failures of Bertrand Russell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Gödel tapping the sign

No consistent system of axioms whose theorems can be listed by an effective procedure (i.e., an algorithm) is capable of proving all truths about the arithmetic of natural numbers

permalink
report
parent
reply

:wojak-nooo: Kronecker and Wittgenstein crying: Noooo! you can’t use a diagonalization argument to prove by contradiction.

Cantor, Gödel and Turing: haha, well look at that, the diagonal can’t exist. QED

Whoops: Hilbert actually liked Cantor’s proof.

permalink
report
parent
reply

philosophy

!philosophy@hexbear.net

Create post

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

“I thunk it so I dunk it.” - Descartes


Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

Community stats

  • 43

    Monthly active users

  • 116

    Posts

  • 502

    Comments