You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
243 points

I’d pay for YouTube premium if t wasn’t more expensive than HBO. It’s ridiculous. Especially considering YouTube has no production costs. It’s all user-generated content.

permalink
report
reply
69 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

the users do get paid though, although i’m sure it’s a fraction of what youtube makes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Hmmm. $20 a month for the big budget action of Westworld, or $20 a month for a cooking show filmed in someone’s basement. Decisions, decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

To be fair, YouTube has far more variety and far more content overall. Personally, I have seen pretty much anything worth watching on the major streaming services. My wife and I can just ignore any top 200 list of shows or movies because we have already seen it all and anything we haven’t seen doesn’t look interesting to us. We just have to wait for new shows to come out.

YouTube though. It’s functionally unlimited considering the length of a human lifespan.

For some insight, a quick Google search says that Netflix has about 4 years of content if you sat down and watched everything they have to offer. Meanwhile, YouTube has about 18,000 years of content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The irony of this comment is you can find the cooking show but not Westworld on HBO lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

honestly i will watch westworld once, but i never use my netflix account but i watch stuff like physics lectures and chemistry videos all the time. i just find it fascinating, in a way scripted TV isn’t for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’d pay more for YouTube rather than HBO/Netflix. There’s much more content that interests me on YouTube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Or $20 for thousands of different channels of all kinds of content.

At least be honest about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

We actually don’t know what percentage they’re making. They can tell you how much they’re paid, but no one but Google can tell you how much of the subscription cost goes to them versus Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This was maybe 5 or so years ago, but I remember Game Grumps did mention something along the lines of how they get more from someone watching their video on YouTube premium vs someone who watches their videos with ads playing.

It’s still not a ton of info, and I’m not sure if it’s still true. Or maybe it’s different for every channel or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It’s such a low number most people would be disgusted.

We’re talking a few bucks for a million views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the big guys get sponsors to fund them, not ad revenue

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

cpm = cents per million

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s about 1$ per 1000 views. Source: my small YT channel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You can get Premium cheaper through other countries. It’s super simple. I only pay about 1€ / month and that feels about right to me unlike the 15€ or something I’d have to pay otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Isn’t there a risk of getting your Google account banned for doing this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s definitely a TOS violation (as is using any kind of VPN to access their content apparently) but I never heard of anyone having trouble with it. Either way, I moved off of other Google services completely, so it would not be a huge loss for me at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve been doing it for four years and never had a problem with it. There are so many people from India that live and travel in my country so how would they know that I’m not one of them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m guessing via a VPN, but which country do you connect to for the low prices?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Argentina or (in my case) Turkey seem to be popular options. You only need to use a VPN when setting up the first payment. Your credit card can be from your home country, no checks at all. After that it’ll just work and you won’t need a VPN anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m from India and it’s about ₹120 ~ $1.4.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Which country did you go through? I assume you purchase on a VPN and then after it applies normally?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yep! I left another reply with more details. I’m using Turkey and it’s super easy to set up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

More video is uploaded every minute than anyone can ever watch in a lifetime. It costs money to store and serve all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Then they shouldn’t store everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Isn’t their issue more hosting costs and not production costs? Unless they start telling people they can’t upload videos (exception being copyright of course) Youtube greatly outpaces the storage costs of other social media sites.

They probably still store more than other video-hosting sites too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

their problem is probably paying $2 billion a year or some crazy number for nfl football.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It should be a crime the way they make you subscribe to YouTube Music to get YouTube Premium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The pricing feels like it only makes sense if you want to use YouTube Music (and thus also don’t use one of the many streaming music competitors). Paying a couple of bucks extra for ad free YouTube is fine and that’s why I pay it personally. But if I wasn’t a YTM user already, I don’t think I would.

And most people don’t want to switch streaming music services. I did that years ago and it sucked. Music is the kinda thing where you really benefit from the service knowing your tastes. I only did it because back then, Spotify was missing some of my favourite artists while Google Play Music had them. I don’t even know if that applies today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a bit disingenuous, IMO. Of course they don’t pay to produce content, but they definitely pay quite a lot to store all of the video that millions of people are uploading daily for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Idk if the price is that ridiculous, the family plan costs me 16 bucks and I have YT premium for my household+. I also have YouTube music from that as well, I find it better than spotify for my use and I dont have to put up additional cost for music streaming elsewhere. There was also youtube premium content (Youtube Red?) if that is still a thing, I remember the Vsauce series being available because of this.

Youtube having no costs is a hot take if ive ever seen one, but I dont think I can say anything about this that hasnt been said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Only a kid used to having mommy and daddy pay for everything would claim youtube has no costs. It is amazing how many people on social media think everything should be free. The real issue here it is the lack of competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A part of your YT Premium payment goes directly to creators that you watch based on your watch time. That is their content expenses just like HBO for making new shows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Yeah they just need storage for millions of people and bandwidth for billions no biggie, thank you for your expertise

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

lol zero production costs because they’re not a production studio, genius, lmao. they do have a shit ton of overhead costs though - look into it instead of acting like it costs nothing to be the largest video hosted site on the planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Keep 720p only for users who upload crap and aren’t generating revenue and keep 4k for the channels who are uploading quality content. I’ve seen a podcast uploading hours of content in 4k. That is incredibly costly to stream to people.

I’m not going to pay for a service that is so wasteful with their income and then they want more.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 556K

    Comments