There was an issue on Reddit a while back where people would post some hateful stuff, and of course lots of people blocked them.
After a while, anti-trans, racist, and far-right-wing stuff were only seen by non-logged in users, other bigots, or new people, and they weren’t getting the downvotes they deserved.
Is this going to be a problem on Lemmy too? I’m worried that if we’re all blocking shitty users that we’re just hiding the problem from ourselves, not fixing it.
Why does it need to be managed? They come out with this beautiful social media platform free of slimy corporate intentions and you complain there’s not enough banning and censorship? I’m sorry the fediverse isn’t advertiser-friendly enough for you.
Let people see for themselves that those people are assholes. Trying to obliterate all opposing views from existence is not how to make things better.
Do you even hear yourself?
“I’m concerned that there’s gonna be a lot of Nazi stuff on here.” “Step off with your advertiser friendly BS”
Agreed. This has nothing to do with advertisers. It’s about creating a community where hate speech is not allowed. Free speech doesn’t include nazi, transphobes and the likes.
Why not though? If you put conditions on free speech then where does it stop?
Mipadaitu actually has a point. They shouldn’t be blocked if that’s just hiding the issue. People should just disagree with them and say so. That way everyone can see there’s only two hateful dickheads in the thread and 500 caring people. What’s wrong with that approach?
The problem with that approach depends on the issue we’re talking about. To continue picking on the Nazis: allowing them to “just ask questions” for example is a great way to allow them to spread their ideology in a way that thoughtful moderation could prevent.
