That’s it. Our instance requires us to stop responding if you explicitly ask us to. It’s right here buried in our Code of Conduct

Any discussions may be opted out of by disengaging.

In the past, this rule has only applied to the specific user you say it to. I’d like to suggest going forward that if someone on another instance uses it, we treat it as applying to all of us.

Unfortunately this rule wasn’t communicated clearly before, so I’m making this post for visibility.

Edit: As the comments clarify, this has to be done in good faith, typically just a one word “disengage” comment. If you add more stuff to the discussion and then say “disengage” at the end, you’re not disengaging, it’s a way to put a stop to a toxic argument not to get the last word in.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
20 points
*

yeah. it makes sense to prioritize peace and unity among comrades, but between comrades and liberals maybe we should prioritize getting the message out.

maybe it works as long as “disengage” is a single word comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

maybe it works as long as “disengage” is a single word comment

It would but in practice it far more often than not is some epic zinger then “disengage.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

We could lean hard into the “has to be in good faith” clause to put them in the ultimatum of “this will only work if you resist your impulse to be an asshole”

permalink
report
parent
reply