You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points

He’s being called a neanderthal because he seems to agree with a lot of fringe opinions.

I mean that’s just a symptom of the biggest complaint about him. He’s really gullible. He’s not malicious, but god damn he does not notice a liar when a liar is in front of him. Genuinely I do love his long form content, I love how people can go off topic with him, but some of the people he brings on really should be going in front of Jon Stewart instead.

Like… here’s an example of someone clearly lying, dodging questions, and genuinely being sketchy. He’s gotten a bit better but would Joe Rogan push this hard against somebody? If someone dodges his question, how well does he bring the topic back to it? Joe Rogan is great when everyone is there in good faith, but would you want him in your corner if you’re stuck in a timeshare conference?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

This is kind of where I’m coming from. I’m not a regular listener of his so my views may be outdated. I just think a lot of malice is dumped on him that I don’t think is necessarily fair. That being said, he is a public figure so being dumb only gets you so far as an excuse.

I also like long form stuff, and I like to talk to people who know things, so at least in an ideal sense I’m positive on his format. B

😂 for the timeshare conference

permalink
report
parent
reply

> Greentext

!greentext@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 455

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments

Community moderators