It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
60 points

But the mice genetically predisposed to getting tumors got tumors. What more proof do you need?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It’s official: Cancer causes cancer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

One step closer cancer causing mice

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fun fact. A potential side effect of many cancer treatments is… cancer

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

just gotta hope it kills the old cancer before it gives you a new cancer

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

How hecking cancerous cancer is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Cancer%

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 124K

    Comments